surface area Search Results


area alphaplate  (Revvity)
92
Revvity area alphaplate
Area Alphaplate, supplied by Revvity, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 92/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/area alphaplate/product/Revvity
Average 92 stars, based on 1 article reviews
area alphaplate - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
92/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier
surface area instrument  (Quantachrome gmbh)
90
Quantachrome gmbh surface area instrument
Surface Area Instrument, supplied by Quantachrome gmbh, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/surface area instrument/product/Quantachrome gmbh
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
surface area instrument - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier
bet surface area measurement  (Quantachrome gmbh)
90
Quantachrome gmbh bet surface area measurement
Bet Surface Area Measurement, supplied by Quantachrome gmbh, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/bet surface area measurement/product/Quantachrome gmbh
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
bet surface area measurement - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier
bet n2 sorption quantachrome novawin  (Quantachrome gmbh)
90
Quantachrome gmbh bet n2 sorption quantachrome novawin
Bet N2 Sorption Quantachrome Novawin, supplied by Quantachrome gmbh, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/bet n2 sorption quantachrome novawin/product/Quantachrome gmbh
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
bet n2 sorption quantachrome novawin - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier
surface area analyzer smart sorb  (Smart Instruments Co)
90
Smart Instruments Co surface area analyzer smart sorb
Surface Area Analyzer Smart Sorb, supplied by Smart Instruments Co, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/surface area analyzer smart sorb/product/Smart Instruments Co
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
surface area analyzer smart sorb - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier
novatouch lx2 surface area analyzer  (Quantachrome gmbh)
90
Quantachrome gmbh novatouch lx2 surface area analyzer
Novatouch Lx2 Surface Area Analyzer, supplied by Quantachrome gmbh, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/novatouch lx2 surface area analyzer/product/Quantachrome gmbh
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
novatouch lx2 surface area analyzer - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier
culture plate insert membrane dishes pore size 0.4 lm  (Becton Dickinson)
90
Becton Dickinson culture plate insert membrane dishes pore size 0.4 lm
Culture Plate Insert Membrane Dishes Pore Size 0.4 Lm, supplied by Becton Dickinson, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/culture plate insert membrane dishes pore size 0.4 lm/product/Becton Dickinson
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
culture plate insert membrane dishes pore size 0.4 lm - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier
relative surface area increase in percent  (Colorbar Inc)
90
Colorbar Inc relative surface area increase in percent
( A and B ) Control for viewing angle. ( A ) A shoot apex imaged from different directions. A first image stack (in red) was acquired before tilting the Z axis (dashed lines) by approximately 30° and acquiring a second stack (in green). Cells were then segmented on both stacks and their areas compared ( B ). Note that the pairwise cell size differences are random, with no obvious trend related to the viewing angle. Average error per cell is less than 2%. Colorbar: <t>relative</t> <t>surface</t> <t>area</t> <t>increase</t> in percent. Panels ( A ) and ( B ) adapted from Figure 5 of . ( C and D ) Comparison between projected areas and actual 3D volumes. ( C ) The epidermal cells of the apex were projected on the surface and segmented. Heatmap shows percent increase in area over 11 hr of growth. ( D ) The same data was segmented in 3D. Heatmap shows the percent increase in volume of cells, same color scale as in ( C ). Note the close correspondence in cell expansion extracted from surface and volumetric segmentations. ( E ) Difference in size between automatically and manually segmented cells on a tomato shoot apex. Cells fused by auto-segmentation are in bright red, split cells are in dark blue. ( F ) Cell sizes (in μm 2 ) from manual (top) and automatic (bottom) segmentation on a fragment of Drosophila wing disc. Scale bars: 40 μm. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.05864.021
Relative Surface Area Increase In Percent, supplied by Colorbar Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/relative surface area increase in percent/product/Colorbar Inc
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
relative surface area increase in percent - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier
mechanics poisson-boltzmann surface area calculations  (Molecular Dynamics Inc)
90
Molecular Dynamics Inc mechanics poisson-boltzmann surface area calculations
( A and B ) Control for viewing angle. ( A ) A shoot apex imaged from different directions. A first image stack (in red) was acquired before tilting the Z axis (dashed lines) by approximately 30° and acquiring a second stack (in green). Cells were then segmented on both stacks and their areas compared ( B ). Note that the pairwise cell size differences are random, with no obvious trend related to the viewing angle. Average error per cell is less than 2%. Colorbar: <t>relative</t> <t>surface</t> <t>area</t> <t>increase</t> in percent. Panels ( A ) and ( B ) adapted from Figure 5 of . ( C and D ) Comparison between projected areas and actual 3D volumes. ( C ) The epidermal cells of the apex were projected on the surface and segmented. Heatmap shows percent increase in area over 11 hr of growth. ( D ) The same data was segmented in 3D. Heatmap shows the percent increase in volume of cells, same color scale as in ( C ). Note the close correspondence in cell expansion extracted from surface and volumetric segmentations. ( E ) Difference in size between automatically and manually segmented cells on a tomato shoot apex. Cells fused by auto-segmentation are in bright red, split cells are in dark blue. ( F ) Cell sizes (in μm 2 ) from manual (top) and automatic (bottom) segmentation on a fragment of Drosophila wing disc. Scale bars: 40 μm. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.05864.021
Mechanics Poisson Boltzmann Surface Area Calculations, supplied by Molecular Dynamics Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/mechanics poisson-boltzmann surface area calculations/product/Molecular Dynamics Inc
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
mechanics poisson-boltzmann surface area calculations - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier
activated coconut shell charcoal (20–40 mesh, 1100–1200 m 2 /g surface area)  (Fisher Scientific)
90
Fisher Scientific activated coconut shell charcoal (20–40 mesh, 1100–1200 m 2 /g surface area)
( A and B ) Control for viewing angle. ( A ) A shoot apex imaged from different directions. A first image stack (in red) was acquired before tilting the Z axis (dashed lines) by approximately 30° and acquiring a second stack (in green). Cells were then segmented on both stacks and their areas compared ( B ). Note that the pairwise cell size differences are random, with no obvious trend related to the viewing angle. Average error per cell is less than 2%. Colorbar: <t>relative</t> <t>surface</t> <t>area</t> <t>increase</t> in percent. Panels ( A ) and ( B ) adapted from Figure 5 of . ( C and D ) Comparison between projected areas and actual 3D volumes. ( C ) The epidermal cells of the apex were projected on the surface and segmented. Heatmap shows percent increase in area over 11 hr of growth. ( D ) The same data was segmented in 3D. Heatmap shows the percent increase in volume of cells, same color scale as in ( C ). Note the close correspondence in cell expansion extracted from surface and volumetric segmentations. ( E ) Difference in size between automatically and manually segmented cells on a tomato shoot apex. Cells fused by auto-segmentation are in bright red, split cells are in dark blue. ( F ) Cell sizes (in μm 2 ) from manual (top) and automatic (bottom) segmentation on a fragment of Drosophila wing disc. Scale bars: 40 μm. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.05864.021
Activated Coconut Shell Charcoal (20–40 Mesh, 1100–1200 M 2 /G Surface Area), supplied by Fisher Scientific, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/activated coconut shell charcoal (20–40 mesh, 1100–1200 m 2 /g surface area)/product/Fisher Scientific
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
activated coconut shell charcoal (20–40 mesh, 1100–1200 m 2 /g surface area) - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier
ha nanoparticle powder ~100 particle size and 15 m 2 /g surface area  (Nanocerox Inc)
90
Nanocerox Inc ha nanoparticle powder ~100 particle size and 15 m 2 /g surface area
( A and B ) Control for viewing angle. ( A ) A shoot apex imaged from different directions. A first image stack (in red) was acquired before tilting the Z axis (dashed lines) by approximately 30° and acquiring a second stack (in green). Cells were then segmented on both stacks and their areas compared ( B ). Note that the pairwise cell size differences are random, with no obvious trend related to the viewing angle. Average error per cell is less than 2%. Colorbar: <t>relative</t> <t>surface</t> <t>area</t> <t>increase</t> in percent. Panels ( A ) and ( B ) adapted from Figure 5 of . ( C and D ) Comparison between projected areas and actual 3D volumes. ( C ) The epidermal cells of the apex were projected on the surface and segmented. Heatmap shows percent increase in area over 11 hr of growth. ( D ) The same data was segmented in 3D. Heatmap shows the percent increase in volume of cells, same color scale as in ( C ). Note the close correspondence in cell expansion extracted from surface and volumetric segmentations. ( E ) Difference in size between automatically and manually segmented cells on a tomato shoot apex. Cells fused by auto-segmentation are in bright red, split cells are in dark blue. ( F ) Cell sizes (in μm 2 ) from manual (top) and automatic (bottom) segmentation on a fragment of Drosophila wing disc. Scale bars: 40 μm. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.05864.021
Ha Nanoparticle Powder ~100 Particle Size And 15 M 2 /G Surface Area, supplied by Nanocerox Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/ha nanoparticle powder ~100 particle size and 15 m 2 /g surface area/product/Nanocerox Inc
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
ha nanoparticle powder ~100 particle size and 15 m 2 /g surface area - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier
half-area polystyrene surface plates corning microplate #3880  (Corning Life Sciences)
90
Corning Life Sciences half-area polystyrene surface plates corning microplate #3880
( A and B ) Control for viewing angle. ( A ) A shoot apex imaged from different directions. A first image stack (in red) was acquired before tilting the Z axis (dashed lines) by approximately 30° and acquiring a second stack (in green). Cells were then segmented on both stacks and their areas compared ( B ). Note that the pairwise cell size differences are random, with no obvious trend related to the viewing angle. Average error per cell is less than 2%. Colorbar: <t>relative</t> <t>surface</t> <t>area</t> <t>increase</t> in percent. Panels ( A ) and ( B ) adapted from Figure 5 of . ( C and D ) Comparison between projected areas and actual 3D volumes. ( C ) The epidermal cells of the apex were projected on the surface and segmented. Heatmap shows percent increase in area over 11 hr of growth. ( D ) The same data was segmented in 3D. Heatmap shows the percent increase in volume of cells, same color scale as in ( C ). Note the close correspondence in cell expansion extracted from surface and volumetric segmentations. ( E ) Difference in size between automatically and manually segmented cells on a tomato shoot apex. Cells fused by auto-segmentation are in bright red, split cells are in dark blue. ( F ) Cell sizes (in μm 2 ) from manual (top) and automatic (bottom) segmentation on a fragment of Drosophila wing disc. Scale bars: 40 μm. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.05864.021
Half Area Polystyrene Surface Plates Corning Microplate #3880, supplied by Corning Life Sciences, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/half-area polystyrene surface plates corning microplate #3880/product/Corning Life Sciences
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
half-area polystyrene surface plates corning microplate #3880 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

Image Search Results


( A and B ) Control for viewing angle. ( A ) A shoot apex imaged from different directions. A first image stack (in red) was acquired before tilting the Z axis (dashed lines) by approximately 30° and acquiring a second stack (in green). Cells were then segmented on both stacks and their areas compared ( B ). Note that the pairwise cell size differences are random, with no obvious trend related to the viewing angle. Average error per cell is less than 2%. Colorbar: relative surface area increase in percent. Panels ( A ) and ( B ) adapted from Figure 5 of . ( C and D ) Comparison between projected areas and actual 3D volumes. ( C ) The epidermal cells of the apex were projected on the surface and segmented. Heatmap shows percent increase in area over 11 hr of growth. ( D ) The same data was segmented in 3D. Heatmap shows the percent increase in volume of cells, same color scale as in ( C ). Note the close correspondence in cell expansion extracted from surface and volumetric segmentations. ( E ) Difference in size between automatically and manually segmented cells on a tomato shoot apex. Cells fused by auto-segmentation are in bright red, split cells are in dark blue. ( F ) Cell sizes (in μm 2 ) from manual (top) and automatic (bottom) segmentation on a fragment of Drosophila wing disc. Scale bars: 40 μm. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.05864.021

Journal: eLife

Article Title: MorphoGraphX: A platform for quantifying morphogenesis in 4D

doi: 10.7554/eLife.05864

Figure Lengend Snippet: ( A and B ) Control for viewing angle. ( A ) A shoot apex imaged from different directions. A first image stack (in red) was acquired before tilting the Z axis (dashed lines) by approximately 30° and acquiring a second stack (in green). Cells were then segmented on both stacks and their areas compared ( B ). Note that the pairwise cell size differences are random, with no obvious trend related to the viewing angle. Average error per cell is less than 2%. Colorbar: relative surface area increase in percent. Panels ( A ) and ( B ) adapted from Figure 5 of . ( C and D ) Comparison between projected areas and actual 3D volumes. ( C ) The epidermal cells of the apex were projected on the surface and segmented. Heatmap shows percent increase in area over 11 hr of growth. ( D ) The same data was segmented in 3D. Heatmap shows the percent increase in volume of cells, same color scale as in ( C ). Note the close correspondence in cell expansion extracted from surface and volumetric segmentations. ( E ) Difference in size between automatically and manually segmented cells on a tomato shoot apex. Cells fused by auto-segmentation are in bright red, split cells are in dark blue. ( F ) Cell sizes (in μm 2 ) from manual (top) and automatic (bottom) segmentation on a fragment of Drosophila wing disc. Scale bars: 40 μm. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.05864.021

Article Snippet: Colorbar: relative surface area increase in percent.

Techniques: Control, Comparison